Thursday, 6 February 2014

Good to take a break from your marriage

There are more fights than hugs in your relationship, but will taking a time-out help?

In 2010 a couple, both in their late 20s, approached psychologist Hvovi Bhagwagar. The couple, says the Powai-based counsellor, had drifted apart and there was no spark left in their marriage. There was no sexual intimacy or any kind of companionship. On the verge of divorce, they came in for a consultation, at their friends' suggestion, and then decided to take a 'time-out', to work on their marriage.

Through this separation period, which lasted two years, the couple took both individual, as well as marriage counselling. "Over the two years of separation, the couple realised that they hadstopped working on their marriage on a daily basis and were taking each other for granted. They started meeting on date nights during the separation, the spark returned in their marriage and by 2012 they got back together," says Bhagwagar.

What do you do when a relationship reaches a breaking point? Many opt for a time-out. This time-out (or separation) in India, says divorcelawyer Mrunalini Deshmukh, has no legal connotations. "As per Indian law, a couple can part ways either by divorce or through a judicial separation where the husband and wife can stay separately without being accused of desertion while retaining the tag of a married couple," she adds. A separation is a period where the couple decide to take a break from the relationship to give each other space and time.

Making it work 
While it worked for this couple, most experts say taking a time-out is not a fool-proof method of rebuilding the relationship. Its success is hinged on who is asking for it and why. "If it's only one person in the relationship who wants a time-out, it's likely that what they want is to end the relationship. For this break to work, both have to be on the same page," says clinical psychologist Varkha Chulani.

While the purpose is to get some time and space away from each other, this period should also be used to introspect on why the relationship failed. "However, if you use this new 'free' time to simply go out with friends and enjoy your single days, you will find yourself facing the same issues that you did on Day 1 at the end of the period," she adds, suggesting that those investing in a timeout use this time to reflect on themselves. "Sit back and understand the person you have become and whether you see your current partner fitting into your future," Chulani says.

Time it right 
The success rate of separations, most experts say, is low because by the time the couple meets a counsellor the wedge in their relationship is already deep, drawn out by years of conflict. Coupleswho go for counselling in the initial stages of a breakdown, says Mridula Kadam, a senior lawyer at the family court, have a better chance at reconciliation. "A trial separation works in their favour as they can work on themselves and the relationship through therapy," she says, adding that she has also seen couples who, after filing for divorce, and undergoing the mandatory separation have managed to work it out. "But that percentage is low. However, I would suggest separation to most warring couples because this period helps you think about your decision and how life will be after it," she adds.

Clocking it 
How long should the time-out last? While there is no definitive period of how long a 'break' should be, Chulani says it shouldn't be lesser than two weeks. "What you are looking for is some time to see if your differences can be ironed out or if they are irreconcilable. You will need to be away from each other for at least a fortnight. A twoday break won't work," she adds.

While the couple can meet and talk to each other during this period, Bhagwagar suggests 'titrated' interaction, i.e. meeting and talking only at pre-decided times and for designated periods. "There has to be some communication between the two. But clocking your time together will mean that the interaction will not be as intense as it was before," she adds.

Making the announcement 
What prevents a large number of couples from opting for separation is the fear of social backlash, especially from the family. "I personally suggest that the family doesn't get involved," says Kadam. "Inform them," she adds, "but don't allow their views to affect yours. Tell them that this is what you want."

Meeting the friends 
When you are dating someone or married to someone, their friends become your pals. And a separation can often become awkward when both you and your partner are invited to the same do.

Handle it maturely, advises Bhagwagar. If it's a large gathering you should say hello to your partner and their friends and move away discreetly to join your friends.

However, if it's a sit-down dinner or a more intimate gathering, decline the invite especially if you know that your partner is going. The common friend will only to be too relieved.

NEWS Link:- http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/life-style/relationships/man-woman/Good-to-take-a-break-from-your-marriage/articleshow/29942747.cms

Deserted by wife, man hangs himself in Vatva

AHMEDABAD: A 30-year-old man hanged himself at his residence in Vatva on Tuesday night. In the primary investigation, police suspects that he took the extreme step after his wife allegedly eloped with her lover taking along with the couple's five-year-old daughter.

According to the Vatva GIDC police, Bhagwan Dubey, a resident of Saibaba Apartment in Bhagwanwadi was found dead by his neighbours on Wednesday when he did not respond torepeated calls. When neighbours broke the door, they found him hanging from a ceiling fan with a rope.

Police investigators said that Dubey's wife Mamta was in love with a man identified as Parmesh, living in the next block. Dubey was not aware of the affair but when he did not see his wife and daughter, he got worried and tried to contact them. At that very moment, nearby residents broke the news that she might have eloped. When Dubey checked on the valuables, he found that she had taken away gold jewellery, cash and papers of the house with her.

"When he realized what the others were saying may have some truth, he broke down. He kept on searching for them from afternoon to night. He had locked himself in after which he was found dead. We have come to know that Parmesh is also married and has kids," said a Vatva police official.

Investigations are underway, police added.

NEWS Link:- http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/ahmedabad/Deserted-by-wife-man-hangs-himself-in-Vatva/articleshow/29919457.cms

Domestic violence Act is basically civil law: HC

AHMEDABAD: In an important decision, Gujarathigh court has ruled that it cannot quash a complaint filed under the Protection of Women From Domestic Violence Act, 2005 under the law by which it cancels ordinary FIRs filed by police.

Rejecting a petition that demanded quashing of one such complaint filed under DV Act, the high court has made some important observations on whether word 'domestic violence' means criminal act or not. This Act is essentially a civil law, but the legislation has prescribed that courts have to proceed in such cases as per the Criminal Procedure Code (CrPC) for the purpose of effective actions. It added that this law is meant to protect women's civil rights also.

The court has said that DV Act is not meant to punish those against whom women file complaint. The only exception in this is the violation of court orders under section 31 of the law - about protection of complainant and sharing of accommodation or other directions. The court said, "It cannot be said that word 'domestic violence' as defined in Section 3 of DV Act constitute an offence under DV Act so as to attract section 4(2) of CrPC."

The court order further said, "Therefore, though the expression 'violence' connotes criminality referable to criminal mindset, the object of act being to assist the aggrieved person suffering from domestic violence by providing to her various reliefs as above and the act of domestic violence not being punishable under DV Act, it cannot be said that mere use of expression 'violence' would render the applications under Sections 12, 17 to 4 of the DV Act as criminal proceedings. The fact that the civil remedies are provided to aggrieved person is also made eloquent by objects and reasons of this law as well."

The high court has also observed that the legislation has left it to the concerned criminal courtand to the judicial officers to decide whether the complaint made by women reveals criminal action by her family members. It is left to the judicial magistrate to decide whether to invoke Indian Penal Code and charge the respondents on basis of the complaint filed under the DV Act.

NEWS Link:- http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/ahmedabad/Domestic-violence-Act-is-basically-civil-law-HC/articleshow/29919582.cms

Health Officer arrested for sexually harassing 37-year-old worker

#Bhopal #Madhya Pradesh A 55-year-old health officer of Madhya Pradesh government has been arrested on the charges of sexually harassing a 37-year-old woman health worker at a clinic in Bhopal, police said on Thursday.
"The accused Dr RS Parihar was apprehended yesterday after the woman filed a complaint against him for allegedly making indecent gestures at her at the dispensary they are attached to", said ADG, Mahila Thana (women police station), Aruna Rao.
Police said the victim produced audio and video recording of the alleged incident that had happened on January 24.
"Parihar began taking an undue interest in the victim after the death of her husband. He even promised her to arrange a house on rent", Rao said quoting the complaint. On January 24, Parihar asked the victim to stay at the clinic for some work and allegedly outraged her modesty, police said.
NEWS Link:- http://www.news18.com/news/madhya-pradesh/health-officer-arrested-for-sexually-harassing-37-year-old-worker-353299.html

Tuesday, 4 February 2014

A patriarchal society limits the role of a man

n India, rape and sexual harassment are often seen as a reflection of a society deeply ridden in patriarchy with the woman being abused and the man inflicting the abuse. Debates on this subject have pushed for change that would empower women and put a sensitive system in place that addresses 
such crimes and works towards a change in society. But is this enough?
A patriarchal society does not merely make a woman subordinate. It limits the role of a man. Sexual abuse is not only inflicted on women but also on men and often by men themselves. While there is no doubt that women need to be protected from abusive men, the defined role and description of a man is such that he has to be powerful and  dominant. Besides the expectation is also that his partner would be a woman, the subordinate individual.
It took years for society to accept men as active members in a kitchen, someone who can design clothes for women, would love to run a home, spend time with children, or even cry. The point is not about men taking over traditionally assumed spaces that women were limited to but is about the realisation that men would probably move into different spaces and assume a notion of women that is far more equal. Women would also have more options to choose from and a role that is not limited primarily to what we see generally and assume is her domain.
This is not where the impact of patriarchy ends. Opaque senselessness that has hinged beliefs on fixed notions has an impact that goes beyond public life: a woman can only partner a man. A man can only love a woman who has to ‘serve’ him.
Patriarchy interferes with the reality of homosexuality as well as bisexuality. What we see in all the ‘progressive’ debates and laws on rape, molestation and sexual harassment is the absence and exclusion of an important section — the LGBT community. And if you take a closer view of this community, you would see probably a lot more similarities in the abuse and suffering that women go through. The only difference is their (LGBT) form of love is a crime in itself.
Now, if given a chance, more men can appear as beauties, as we slowly see them emerge from being the macho man. But something as simple as this is difficult for a society such as ours to assimilate.
If we were to realise and appreciate the transcending possibilities of differing roles and individuality, we could be a far more caring culture. We would today, not just count the number of sexual assaults against women but also count and take action and raise voices every time a man or boy is abused within his own home. Reports suggest that almost 60% of children face abuse in domestic surroundings and one could safely say that boys too are abused.

These children grow into a system that permits such acts and then limits each individual into a prototype of sorts. A boy should not cry, that is the privilege of women. A man can’t be seen as to have been abused. That is a sign of weakness which questions the strength that defines manliness, and so on. And yes, everyone is heterosexual, those who aren’t, are not normal!
In this state and time we live in, discourse needs to have a broader parameter and sense of reality. What is needed is a gender-neutral policy that sees each human being as one. By viewing each other in different roles, particularly the male, we could seriously be challenging patriarchy leading to a far more significant change in society.

Sharif D Rangnekar is CEO & Director, Integral PR

The views expressed by the author are personal

- See more at: http://www.hindustantimes.com/comment/analysis/a-patriarchal-society-limits-the-role-of-a-man/article1-1180078.aspx#.UvEGK20VGyA.blogger

हरियाणा में पत्नी ने पति को छत से फेंका!

जींद
राज नगर कॉलोनी में पत्नी ने अपनी मां, बहन तथा भाई के साथ मिलकर पति की जान लेने की नीयत से छत से नीचे फेंक दिया। पति को गंभीर चोटें आईं। घायल ने आरोप लगाया कि उसको मारने के षडयंत्र में हरियाणा पुलिस का एएसआई भी शामिल है, जिसके उसकी पत्नी और साली के साथ अवैध संबंध हैं। शहर थाना पुलिस ने घायल की शिकायत पर पत्नी, साली, सास, साले और एएसआई के खिलाफ जान से मारने की कोशिश करने का मामला दर्ज किया है। पुलिस मामले की छानबीन कर रही है।

राज नगर निवासी कुलबीर ने पुलिस अधीक्षक बलवान सिंह राणा को दी शिकायत में बताया कि उनकी शादी लगभग 11 साल पहले कैमरी रोड हिसार निवासी कपूर सिंह की बेटी सोमवती के साथ हुई थी। शादी के कुछ समय बाद ही उनकी गृहस्थी में मायके पक्ष ने दखलअंदाजी शुरू कर दी। उनकी पत्नी सोमवती ज्यादातर समय मायके में बिताने लगी, जिसके चलते उनकी गृहस्थी में दरार पड़ने लगी।

आरोप है कि इस सबके पीछे मुख्य रूप से पड़ाव चौक हिसार पुलिस चौकी में ड्यूटीरत एएसआई प्रताप सिंह का हाथ था। उसका अवैध संबंध सोमवती से तो है ही, साथ ही उसकी बहन बिल्लो उर्फ बीरमती से भी है। बीती 28 अगस्त 2013 को सोमवती के भाई, बहन और मां राज नगर आए हुए थे। उन्होंने षडयंत्र के तहत कुलबीर सिंह को छत से नीचे फेंक दिया। इस हादसे में कुलबीर बच तो गए लेकिन उनको काफी चोट लगी।

कुलबीर के पिता ने बताया कि कुलबीर की गृहस्थी उजाड़ने में सोमवती के परिजनों के साथ एएसआई प्रताप सिंह भी शामिल है। वह कुलबीर की गृहस्थी को पटरी पर नहीं आने दे रहा है। पुलिस अधीक्षक ने मामले की जांच डीएसपी को सौंपी थी। उन्होंने राज नगर पहुंच कर कुलबीर के पड़ोसियों और परिजनों से पूछताछ की। बाद में उन्होंने अपनी रिपोर्ट में आरोपियों के खिलाफ कार्रवाई की सिफारिश की। रिपोर्ट के आधार पर शहर थाना पुलिस ने कैमरी रोड निवासी सोमवती, उसकी बहन बिल्लो उर्फ बीरमती, भाई सूमेर सिंह उर्फ कालू, मां नारायाणी देवी और एएसआई प्रताप सिंह के खिलाफ जान से मारने की कोशिश करने का मामला दर्ज कर छानबीन शुरू कर दी है। 
NEWS Link:- http://m.nbt.in/text/details.php?section=top-news&storyid=28745213

Christians must wait one year to file for divorce, Karnataka high court rules

BANGALORE: The separation period required for a Christian couple to file a petition fordissolution of marriage by mutual consent will be one year, the Karnataka high court ruled on Monday. 

The court disposed of public interest litigation relating to Section 10A (1) of the Divorce Act, 1869, (applicable to Christians) in the light of a 2010 verdict of a division bench of the Kerala high court. 

The Kerala court had read down the 'two years' separation period in Section 10 A to 'one year' so as to bring the same in conformity with Section 13B of the Hindu Marriage Act, Section 32B of the Parsi Marriage and Divorce Act and Section 28 of the Special Marriage Act. 

A division bench headed by Chief Justice DH Waghela noted that the Kerala court judgment has become the law of land in the light of an apex court judgment which says that any verdict of a high court holds good for the entire country unless the same is challenged in the apex court. 

The bench also noted that the Centre, which was a respondent before the Kerala court, did not challenge the said judgment. 

During the hearing, counsel for the Archdiocese of Bangalore said that the dissolution of a Christian marriage by divorce by mutual consent or by decree of court is not at all recognized by the Roman Catholic Church (RCC). 

"But realizing that a 'marriage' could be brought about with underlying defects or shortcomings or other disqualification, the RCC has procedure for annulment of marriage. Annulment by church is the only way of termination of marriage recognized by the RCC," he said. 

The PIL was filed by Shivakumar, who challenged the norm under Section 10A of the Divorce act prescribing a two-year period prior to filling of petition for divorce by Christians. 

The petitioner contended that a two-year separation period is arbitrary as the Special Marriages Act, the Hindu Marriage Act and the Parsi Marriage Act have a one-year separation period clause.

The Kerala high court had said: "Having considered all the relevant circumstances, we are of the opinion that the stipulation of a higher period of two years of mandatory minimum separate residence for those to whom the Divorce Act applies, in contra-distinction to those similarly placed to whom Sec 13B of the Hindu Marriage Act, Sec 32B of the Parsi Marriage and Divorce Act and Sec 28 of the Special Marriage Act would apply, offends the mandate of equality and right to life under Arts14 and 21 of the Constitution."

NEWS Link:- http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Christians-must-wait-one-year-to-file-for-divorce-Karnataka-high-court-rules/articleshow/29833246.cms