Monday, 9 December 2013

The unhappy husband of Kiran Bedi

TO BE OR NOT - HUSBAND OF A CELEBRITY

The first woman to enter the IPS which was otherwise a male domain; winner of the prestigious Magasaysay Award for humanely administering Tihar, the largest jail of Asia, Kiran Bedi has slipped miserably on the domestic front. Having a devoted husband and a lovely daughter this terrific police officer hasn’t been able to maintain an equilibrium between marital and parental families. Well known for inviting controversies Kiran Bedi was in news when she left Mizoram overnight. She also declined posting in Jammu & Kashmir. What however haven't been printed' are the controversies in her personal lile which too have surrounded her. DR. UMA ARARA speaks to Brij Bedi, her estranged husband, who lives in Amritsar, to unveil lesser known Kiran.

This lonely man loves to photograph I beautiful women. That's not all. His lens catches the mess in and around the city and with the product he continuously pesters the civic authorities who according to him are deaf, dumb and blind. His passion for Amritsar, the cig in which he has been living since past several decades, comes out strongly the moment one mentions word 'filth'. This philanthropist handsome middle-aged man with a grey crown and Clark Gable moustache the unassuming and low profile husband of a celebrity. Yes we are talking to Brij Bedi, - one wheel of the straddled marriage; the other being first Woman IPS officer Mrs.Kiran Bedi.
Q. How did you meet Kiranji?
A. lt was in 1971 . Basically we are from Dera 'Baba Nanak, Batala and descendents of Guru Nanak. When I was in Khalsa College, Amritsar, I met a triend who taught me photography and lawn tennis. The game interested me so much that even on the examination day I was playing tennis and naturally failed. ln 1971 Kiran had returned from Chandigarh after completion of her M.
A. She was a very good tennis player, in fact her father was very keen to make her an outstanding tennis  player and she went on to become the Asian Champion. We met in the club, played tennis together and became good triends. 
Q.So it was romance on the tennis court?
A. That happened later. At that time I was engaged with a girl from Delhi. Being an idealist l wanted just a simple marriage but the girl's parents refused. So we broke the engagement. Meanwhile I had begun to like Kiran for her intelligence and quick wit. She had told me that if this engagement did not work she would marry me as she wanted to have a husband with similar ideals.
Q. Was it a contractual marriage then?
A. Yes and no. We had ten years difference in our age but our thinking level was the same. lf I had my ideals she had her own conditions. Although  she had taken up a job in Khalsa college it was decided that she would become- an l.A.S. officer failing which she would go to Canada for her Ph.D. She was so intelligent I did not think of stopping her or controlling her just because she was to be my wife. lf she had the ability  and the will power to pursue the goals why' should I or anyone stop her. lnstead  I agreed with her and encouraged her. We were madly in love at that time and such things seemed very superficial. l
Q. You became a visiting husband. How did it affect your lndian male ego?
A. Right from the beginning we knew that our marriage is going to be a unique in its own way. We were not going to be ordinary husband and wife where the woman wastes her talent and intelligence knitting and washing at home. l would never have married such a home bound person. Since it was already decided in our case that she would be posted outside l was mentally prepared to be a visiting husband Besides where there is love there is no ego. I used to cook and eyen polish her shoes. Sometimes when she would be tired I pressed her legs also. I never felt anything wrong in that.
Q. That must have been during the 'first few years of the marriage. When did the problems really start?
A. The problems were there side by side but like all newly weds we ignored them. After two months of marriage she got the call for training. lt was really great in those days. We used to write five letters everyday with numbers 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, marked on them. Even the postman was bewildered. Every day she used to call me over the phone too. It was really romantic. One day when she rang up she was very up set as her name had not appeared in the first list of lAS. I had induced her to take on a challenge and accept the strenuous IPS training. Her parents resisted as there were 'no women r officers in the lndian police force then. Despite this I managed to convince her and she took up the challenge. After the training she was posted at Delhi and I used to visit her on the weekends. Her parents had already shifted to Delhi with her and then her sisters also joined and completed the family coterie around her. ln a two room house it used to become really overcrowded and I felt highly suffocated, Gradually I began to feel very uncomfortable there as her parents would interfere in our personal relationship and we began to drift apart.
Q. How were the 'things when your daughter was born?
A. lt was a planned child and we were both blissful. Till that time Kiran was totally involved with me and my family.  Brij with his daughter Her parents could not cope with that and tried their best by fair or foul means to win her devotion in which they succeeded, I also felt that being a daughter she does have her obligation towards them and never tried to obstruct her relationship with them. But she could not balance her affection for both families and in her heart her parents became everything so much so that the requirements of her husband and daughter became secondary and gradually we became obsolete for her- She is not a successful wife although a very successful and devoted daughter.
Q. Sukriti, Your daughter stays with her mother then how often do you meet her?
A. I go to visit her now. That is the biggest tragedy of our marriage.  She neither got love of her mother nor affection of a father. Kiran was naturally very busy and could spare only a few hurried moments from her busy schedule. I used to go on weekends which was fine but since past eight years I have stopped going to Delhi and the girl is really deprived of parental care. She does come over to Amritsar as and when she can. Her maternal grandparents are there but she resists them like anything. She is the real sufferer; Now she herself is an adult and understands the situation but has not been able to fully cope up. She does not feel comfortable in that house but has to stay there since she is trying for her MBBS degree. There are things in life over which no one has any control. The destiny plays an important role. People are not surprised at Kiran Bedi becoming an IPS officer but her having been married is considered strange. Q.Maybe because of this sourness there have been rumours about a divorce?
A. They (Kiran's parents) wanted a divorce. Even Kiran mentioned it once but I refused saying our achievement is mine". She was my dream. There was a time when she had called me 'her god' in one such interviews. But then things became really bad between us, For our daughter's sake I never thought of a divorce. My 'parents too used to insist sometimes but I did not want to get married again. Q. What about her achievements?  Did you ever envy that?
A. Never. Her achievements were mine. She did her duty well and was appreciate  that more than doing things about prisoners, the criminals the need is to do something about the society outside. About the poor, the rotting, the illiterates. lts time she should quit and involve in the larger canvas. Being a very simple person bereft of inhibitions she can, easily do it.d for that, Personally I feel
 Q.What about your parents? Usually the problems start because of that.
A. (laughs). ln our case it was the other way round. Her own parents had such a hold over her that she could not breakaway from them. Kiran was very close to my mother and accepted many times that she got so many things because of her blessings. When she came for my mother's funeral on her returning to Delhi she got the news about the Magasaysay award. My mother was a very broadminded person, She accepted our relationship ,but the deterioration in it became unbearable for her. She worried what would happen to me after her death.
Q. ln retrospect what would you like to change and at which moment in your life?
A. I have come to believe in destiny. lt had to happen in my life. I was very bitter about the failure of our marriage till a year and half ago but today I have managed to control my emotions and have channelised them properly. I try my best to help people and have made it a mission to pester authorities about their negligence although I still miss having a proper family life especially at times when I am unwell. I no more cry about it. This is all destiny. No one can change anything. 
- See more at: http://www.punjabmonitor.com/2013/04/the-unhappy-husband-of-kiran-bedi.html#sthash.oxC5mNiP.dpuf

Thursday, 5 December 2013

Five-year jail to woman for abetting suicide by husband

The court of additional sessions judge here on Friday sentenced to five years in jail a woman Meenakshi Arora for abetting her husband Vikas Kaplish to commit suicide in 2010.

The court also imposed a fine of Rs. 10,000 on her and in default of payment of fine she was ordered to further undergo imprisonment for six months. The court acquitted four other members of her parents' family.
The case was registered against her and four others including her father Gurditta Mal, mother Raj Rani, sister Seenam and brother-in-law (sister's husband)  Naveen under section 306 of the IPC on the basis of a suicide note recovered by the police and the statement of the brother of the deceased Parvesh Kaplish February 22, 2010.
Meenakshi  Arora, originally a resident of a village in Muktsar district of Punjab, was now residing in Chandigarh'
Parvesh Kaplish had told the police that Vikas was a divorcee and married Meenakshi  without consent of his parents.
After marriage, they came to know that Meenakshi used to take drugs and often remained away from home for several days.

He had alleged Meenakshi and her parents started to harass Vikas so he had taken the extreme step of ending his life.

Tuesday, 3 December 2013

Demanding dowry not enough for conviction in dowry death case: Supreme Court

Merely making a demand for dowry is not enough to bring about a conviction in a dowry death case, the Supreme Court on Tuesday held saying that it must be proved that victim had been treated with cruelty or harassed for it.
"Merely making a demand for dowry is not enough to bring about a conviction under Section 304-B of the IPC. As held in Kans Raj case a dowry death victim should also have been treated with cruelty or harassed for dowry either by her husband or a relative," a bench of justices Ranjana Prakash Desai and Madan B Lokur said.
The bench also expressed concern over delay in disposing of the appeal filed by a man challenging his conviction in dowry death of his sister-in-law which took nine years.
Referring to the delay in dispoal of cases, the court quipped, "It is high time those of us who are judges of this court and decision makers also become policy makers", without elaborating.
The bench acquitted the man Bhola Nath in the case saying that family members cannot be made accused in dowry death case just because they stay together under one floor and there must sufficient evidence against each of them.
"While these persons may be staying together, it does not lead to any positive conclusion that each one of them was actively involved in demanding additional dowry from Janki Devi (victim) and also behaving in a cruel or humiliating manner towards her resulting in her consuming poison to end her life," the bench said.
The court set aside the Punjab and Haryana High Court verdict which had convicted Bhola Nath in the dowry death case.
"In this case, even assuming the silent or conniving participation of Bhola Nath in the demands for dowry, there is absolutely no evidence on record to suggest that he actively or passively treated victim with cruelty or harassed her in connection with, or for, dowry.
"The High Court has, unfortunately, not adverted to this ingredient of an offence punishable under Section 304-B of the IPC or even considered it," the bench said.

No conviction for mere demand of dowry: Supreme Court

NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court has ruled that a person cannot be convicted for merely demanding dowry unless the demand is followed by mental or physical torture resulting in the death of the victim.
A Bench of Justices R M Lodha and A K Patnaik said in a judgement that the prosecution has to establish convincing evidence that the accused had subjected the victim to torture soon before her death in connection with the demand.
"The evidence of Prosecution Witness-2, PW-4 and PW-5 shows that Jagdish and Gordhani played a role in the demand of dowry for a scooter or Rs 25,000 for Amar Singh but demand of dowry by itself is not an offence under Section 498A or Section 304B IPC.
"What is punishable under Section 498A or Section 304B of IPC is the act of cruelty or harassment by the husband or the relative of the husband against the woman," the Bench said.
The bench passed the judgement while upholding the acquittal of Gordhani, mother-in-law, and Jagdish, brother-in-law, in a dowry death case of newly-married woman Santosh in Rajasthan's Alwar district in March, 8, 1993. It however, upheld the conviction of the husband Amar Singh.
The sessions court had convicted all the three for dowry death (304B) and 498A (harassment of married woman by husband/relatives).
The Rajasthan High Court had on an appeal from the accused quashed the conviction of Jagdish and Gordhari while sustaining the life sentence imposed on Amar Singh.
While the state government had appealed against the acquittals, Amar Singh challenged his conviction.

Man arrested for giving flying kiss to woman journalist in Mumbai

Mumbai, Dec 2: A 22-year-old man was arrested at Grant Road area here on Saturday night for giving a flying kiss to a female television journalist, a Deccan Chronicle report said on Monday. The accused was identified as Rahul Umesh Tilak, a private firm employee and a resident of Santa Cruz (West). What had exactly happened on Saturday night? According to the report, the young journalist, who works for a regional news channel, was on her way home from work around 11 pm when the man, standing near a traffic signal and staring at her for some time, suddenly threw a flying kiss at her. The woman called a policeman standing nearby and got Tilak caught. The man was booked under Section 509 of the Indian Penal Code, which makes words, gesture or act intended at insulting the modesty of a woman punishable.

Read more at: http://news.oneindia.in/mumbai/man-arrested-for-giving-flying-kiss-to-woman-journalist-in-mumbai-1351351.html

Original NEWS Source:- http://news.oneindia.in/mumbai/man-arrested-for-giving-flying-kiss-to-woman-journalist-in-mumbai-1351351.html

Monday, 2 December 2013

Women today have more sexual partners than men

A new survey has found that women now-a-days have become more sexually liberated as compared to men, and are engaging in sexual activities with several partners at a younger age.

According to the National Survey of Sexual Attitudes and Lifestyles, women are also leading men in the case of same-sex relationships, with four times as many women now report gay experiences compared to 20 years ago. However, the survey also found that women who have had one or two sexual partners are up to three times more likely than men, to be at the receiving end of sexually transmitted diseases.

One of the survey's lead authors, Professor Kaye Wellings of the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, said that the poll clearly shows that the gap previously seen between men and for women has been closing in the last decades.

Original NEWS Source:- http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/life-style/relationships/man-woman/Women-today-have-more-sexual-partners-than-men/articleshow/26422943.cms?intenttarget=no

Sunday, 1 December 2013

Ladies' gang uses molest trap for cash

KOLKATA: If you are a pedestrian or use the public transport system, beware of a gang of women that traps innocent people as molesters and extorts them.
At a time when sexual harassment cases are shaking the nation, this bunch of women has seized upon the fear psychosis to make some quick money, regardless of what effect it might have on women who are actually victims of molestation and rape.
Such incidents have been reported over the past few weeks but no one had dared go to police until the all-lady gang targeted a lawyer on Wednesday, without realizing his wife was with him or that there were legal clerks around as witnesses.
Lawyer Asim Kumar Maity was returning home when the incident occurred in the busy Dalhousie area.
"It was around 5.30 pm, after the day's work. I, my wife and some law-clerks were looking for a taxi in front of Mughal Garden Restaurant. My wife was a little away chatting with the law clerks. I had just had an altercation with a cabby over refusal. All of sudden, a woman, who looked to be in her late 40s, swung towards me and held me by my collar. I was stunned. I had never even dreamt of being in such a situation," recounted Maity.
The woman charged Maity aggressively and accused him of molesting her. "Why did you touch me," she demanded to know and threatened to "drag him to Hare Street police station".
The commotion quickly attracted a crowd. And as it happens in such cases, people instinctively trust the woman.
"She was hurling filthy abuses to unnerve my husband. In no time, three other women emerged from a nearby alley and joined the first one. By the time I had overcome my initial bafflement and rushed to rescue my husband," said Kaberi Sengupta Maity.
Maity, too, had shaken off his initial shock and shouted back. That his wife was with him gave him added support.
"They were not only abusive but were threatening to put me behind bars. When my wife came to my rescue, they grew more desperate and tried to draw public sympathy by 'showing' how I molested her. From their words, my legal brain could pick up that they knew of Section 354-IPC (molestation) and that it had been made a non-bailable offence," Maity said.
The gang backed off only when they realized Maity was a lawyer and he not only had the support of his wife but a bunch of legal clerks as witnesses.
"Other lawyers also came to our rescue, so did law-clerks. I told them that I was ready to go to any police station and demanded to see their identity. They were still hurling abusive words. By then, a law-clerk brought a cab and we boarded it. The women banged on the taxi as we were about to leave," Maity said.
Since they were all women, Maity and his group decided not to confront them any further. "But later, I felt I must record a complaint as they can harass an unsuspecting citizen and extort him in the name of an out-of-police-station settlement. Police must be proactive to nab the gang before they trap others," he said. Hare Street police are investigating the complaint.